Verisoph
public archive
Add event
4052 accepted outside stories 9706 accepted uncited 4880 accepted cited 361 candidates 18 duplicate groups
all acceptedcandidaterejected cited uncited in stories outside stories duplicates contestedunprovendebunkedlegendary colonialism (3)culture (1216)detention (1)diplomacy (1135)economy (2635)environment (169)exploration (143)kenya (3)pillar (30)politics (6162)propaganda (2)religion (1513)science (650)society (3148)technology (762)violence (1)war (2244) manage topics

12 event(s), 7 uncited and 0 outside stories on this page

0 selected status importance
  1. c. 1001 BCE El Molo settle Lake Turkana as fisher-foragers contested 5 cit. The El Molo are held to have reached the Turkana Basin from the north around 1000 BCE, speaking a Cushitic language related to those of Ethiopia and Somalia. In the arid lakeshore country they turned from herding or farming to fishing and hunting hippo, crocodile, and turtle. Whether they were always foragers or specialised into fishing after arriving is not settled. environment / exploration / society ●●
  2. c. 1000 Bantu farmers settle the Taita Hills contested 3 cit. The Taita are a Bantu-speaking people who settled the isolated Taita Hills, a set of forested mountain blocks rising above the dry Tsavo plains. They grew out of several waves of migrants who clustered into tight hill communities and terraced the slopes for farming. The exact make-up of these early groups is reconstructed from language and oral tradition, so the details are debated. environment / society ●●
  3. c. 1000 The Ogiek as forest-dwelling Southern Nilotic hunter-gatherers of the Mau contested 5 cit. The Ogiek (Okiek) are a Kalenjin-related, Southern Nilotic people long settled in the highland forests of the Mau Escarpment and around Mount Elgon. Their own traditions say they were always in these forests, while some scholars trace an earlier movement south from the highlands north of Lake Turkana. Whether they are an aboriginal remnant of the region or a Southern Nilotic group that specialised in forest foraging is debated. culture / environment / society ●●
  4. c. 1891 The great rinderpest panzootic destroys the cattle contested 0 cit. Around 1890 to 1891 the rinderpest panzootic that swept down Africa reached the Maasai and killed the great majority of their cattle in a matter of months. Herds that had numbered in the thousands were reduced to a handful of survivors. Contemporary and later estimates of losses running above ninety percent of the cattle are widely cited but hard to verify precisely. economy / environment ●●●●
  5. c. 1894 Drought and famine complete the Emutai contested 0 cit. Drought and famine finished what disease had begun, and the Maasai remembered the whole ordeal as the Emutai. Some accounts, including that of the missionary observers, suggested that a large share of the Maasai died in these years, with figures such as half or two-thirds sometimes quoted. Such death-toll fractions are estimates and remain disputed among historians. environment / society ●●●●
  6. February 2010 African Commission backs the Endorois of Lake Bogoria over eviction contested 0 cit. The Endorois are a Baringo community around Lake Bogoria who speak a Kalenjin dialect close to Tugen but see themselves as a distinct people. In the 1970s the government evicted them from land around the lake to create a game reserve. In 2010 the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights ruled that Kenya had violated their rights, a landmark decision recognising indigenous land claims in Africa. environment / politics / society ●●
  7. June 2020 Great Reset initiative launched contested 0 cit. The World Economic Forum launched the Great Reset, a proposal to rethink economies and sustainability after the pandemic. The initiative became a frequent subject of conspiracy theories, though it was a documented set of policy proposals. economy / environment ●●●●
  8. 2021 Critics call the conservancy model a land grab contested 0 cit. Reports by the Oakland Institute and campaigns by Survival International argued that the Northern Rangelands Trust amounted to a land grab and a form of green colonialism. They said pastoralists lost control of their land to a donor-funded body with armed rangers, and pointed to killings and displacement tied to its operations. This reading, attributed to affected communities and these named critics, is contested rather than settled fact. environment / politics / society ●●●
  9. 2021 Conservancy backers defend the community model contested 0 cit. The Northern Rangelands Trust and allied conservationists rejected the land-grab charge, saying the conservancies are owned and governed by the communities themselves. They argued the model reduces cattle raiding and ethnic conflict, protects wildlife, and brings in revenue and jobs through tourism and grazing plans. Which account holds true varies by conservancy and remains genuinely disputed. economy / environment / society ●●
  10. December 2022 The 30x30 target and warnings of mass eviction contested 3 cit. Governments agreed a global goal to protect thirty percent of land and sea by 2030, known as 30x30. Groups including Survival International and Amnesty International warned it could dispossess millions of indigenous and rural people if it followed the fortress model. Supporters said it need not, if it recognised community land rights, but the risk to people like Kenya's Ogiek and pastoralists was real enough to spark alarm. diplomacy / environment / society ●●
  11. c. 2023 Is fortress conservation just when the dispossessed were there first contested 0 cit. Critics and some affected communities push a strong claim that fortress conservation is a form of oppression, taking land from people who lived on it long before the parks existed. Conservationists answer that protected areas save biodiversity that would otherwise be lost and can share benefits with locals. Presented as an open argument rather than a verdict, it asks whether protecting nature can be just when the people removed were there first. environment / politics / society ●●●
  12. March 2023 Survival International attacks the NRT carbon project as Blood Carbon contested 2 cit. Survival International publishes Blood Carbon, arguing that the project makes money from Indigenous pastoralist land without adequate free, prior and informed consent, restricts traditional grazing and rests on weak additionality and opaque benefit sharing. NRT rejects the report and says communities consent, land ownership stays with them and benefits are audited. The dispute is central because it asks whether carbon finance is community income or a new form of green land control. environment / politics / society ●●●●