The Electronic Frontier Foundation is founded
The EFF was founded in 1990 to defend civil liberties in the digital world. It became a leading voice in fights over free speech, privacy, and encryption online.
Verisoph story dossier
The control of the online public square: the national firewalls and internet shutdowns, platform moderation and deplatforming, the documented government-platform contacts, the legislative fights over Section 230 and the DSA...
The control of the online public square: the national firewalls and internet shutdowns, platform moderation and deplatforming, the documented government-platform contacts, the legislative fights over Section 230 and the DSA, and the surveillance that shadows it all. The media, education, and information pillar in the digital age.
59 newly added in the last 14 days
The EFF was founded in 1990 to defend civil liberties in the digital world. It became a leading voice in fights over free speech, privacy, and encryption online.
In the 1990s the US government pushed the Clipper Chip and limits on strong encryption, sparking a fight with technologists and privacy advocates. The clashes over access to encrypted communication have recurred ever since.
also in Anatomy of a superpower: the American state
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protected websites from liability for content posted by their users. The provision became a legal foundation for the modern internet and social media.
China's Ministry of Public Security began the Golden Shield Project in 1998 to build a nationwide system of internet surveillance and filtering. The blocking side of the system became widely known as the Great Firewall.
North Korea operates a walled intranet called Kwangmyong instead of the open internet, with global access limited to a small elite. It is among the most tightly controlled information environments in the world.
Passed weeks after the September 11 attacks, the USA PATRIOT Act broadened government powers to collect communications data. Parts of it later underpinned the bulk collection Snowden exposed.
Tor, short for The Onion Router, was released in 2002 to route traffic through relays and hide users' identities. It became a key tool for evading censorship and surveillance, and a nonprofit was formed in 2006 to run it.
Iran built one of the world's most extensive internet filtering systems, blocking political, social, and news content. The government later expanded the plan into a state-controlled National Information Network.
Founded in 2006, WikiLeaks published leaked government and corporate documents, including US military and diplomatic files in 2010. It tested the limits of transparency, press freedom, and state secrecy online.
China blocked Twitter and Facebook in mid-2009, around the time of ethnic unrest in Urumqi. Both services have remained inaccessible without circumvention tools since then.
After announcing in January 2010 that it would stop censoring results, Google redirected its Chinese search service to Hong Kong in March 2010. The move followed a dispute over hacking and censorship demands.
Virtual private networks moved from corporate use to everyday circumvention, letting people reach blocked sites in censored countries. Governments responded by restricting or banning unauthorized VPNs.
As protests grew during the 2011 uprising, Egypt shut off nearly all internet and mobile networks for several days. It was one of the first national governments to unplug an entire country during unrest.
Tools such as Psiphon and Lantern were built to help people in censored countries reach blocked sites. They became part of an ongoing cat-and-mouse contest with state filtering systems.
On January 18, 2012, Wikipedia and thousands of sites went dark to protest the SOPA and PIPA anti-piracy bills. The backlash stalled the legislation and showed the political power of an organized internet.
Groups defending free expression, privacy, and an open internet grew into a worldwide network of advocates and researchers. They documented shutdowns, challenged surveillance, and pushed back on censorship laws.
In June 2013, former contractor Edward Snowden leaked documents revealing that the NSA collected vast amounts of phone and internet data. The disclosures reshaped the global debate over surveillance and privacy.
Snowden's documents exposed PRISM, a program under which the NSA obtained data from major tech companies. It showed how deeply state surveillance reached into everyday internet services.
Ahead of local elections in 2014, Turkey blocked Twitter and YouTube after leaked recordings circulated online. Courts later ordered the blocks lifted.
China's government outlined a social credit system in 2014 to score the behavior of people and companies. In practice it was a patchwork of local programs, but it signaled a push toward data-driven control.
The Signal messaging app, released in 2014, brought strong end-to-end encryption to a wide audience. Its protocol was later adopted by other major messaging services, making private communication far more common.
In 2015 the Federal Communications Commission reclassified broadband to enforce net neutrality, barring providers from blocking or throttling traffic. Supporters said it protected an open internet.
Researchers documented a Chinese attack tool called the Great Cannon that hijacked web traffic to flood target sites with requests. It was used against services that helped users bypass censorship.
The launch of the free Let's Encrypt service in 2015 helped push most websites to use encrypted HTTPS connections. Widespread encryption made it harder for censors to monitor and selectively block individual pages.
In 2016 the FBI sought a court order forcing Apple to help unlock an iPhone tied to the San Bernardino attack. Apple refused, warning it would weaken security for everyone, and the government dropped the case after finding another way in.
Ethiopia imposed repeated internet shutdowns during protests, exams, and conflict. A prolonged blackout in the Tigray region during the civil war lasted roughly two years.
India has ordered more internet shutdowns than any other country, often citing public order during protests, exams, or unrest. Digital rights groups have tracked hundreds of separate shutdowns.
Major social media companies expanded rules and teams to remove or limit content, from hate speech to misinformation. The scale of these systems made private platforms central gatekeepers of online speech.
Turkey blocked all of Wikipedia in April 2017 over articles it objected to. The country's Constitutional Court later ruled the ban unlawful, and access was restored in January 2020.
Germany's Network Enforcement Act required large platforms to remove clearly illegal content quickly or face heavy fines. It became a model that other governments studied and copied.
In December 2017 the FCC voted to repeal the 2015 net neutrality rules. The reversal reopened a long fight over whether providers can favor or slow certain online traffic.
China rolled out extensive cameras, facial recognition, and data collection, most intensively against Uyghurs in Xinjiang. The system tied online monitoring to physical surveillance and enabled tight control of information.
Kenyan officials warned they could restrict or shut down social media and the internet around contested elections. Rights groups pushed back, and no full national shutdown was carried out.
also in Leaks, whistleblowers, and disclosures
Reporting and whistleblower Christopher Wylie revealed that the firm Cambridge Analytica had harvested data from millions of Facebook users without consent for political profiling. The scandal led to regulatory scrutiny of Facebook and the firm's collapse.
The General Data Protection Regulation began applying in 2018, giving people rights over their personal data and setting large fines for violations. It became a global benchmark for privacy law.
In August 2018, Apple, Facebook, YouTube, and Spotify removed content from Alex Jones and his Infowars brand within days of one another. The coordinated timing fueled debate over platform power.
Users and politicians accused platforms of quietly limiting the reach of accounts without notice, a practice called shadow-banning. Companies said they downranked some content but disputed how the term was used.
A gunman livestreamed a mosque shooting, and platforms struggled to remove millions of copies of the video. The attack led to the Christchurch Call, a pledge by governments and companies to curb violent content online.
The EU's 2019 Copyright Directive included Article 17, which pushed platforms to filter uploads for copyrighted material. Critics warned that automated filtering could sweep up lawful content.
After India revoked the special status of Jammu and Kashmir in August 2019, it cut internet access across the region. The shutdown became the longest ever imposed in a democracy, with high-speed service restored in stages into 2021.
A law signed in 2019 and effective that November aimed to let Russia route its internet traffic through state-controlled points and operate a national network in isolation. Critics said it expanded government control over online speech.
During protests over fuel prices in November 2019, Iran imposed a near-total internet shutdown lasting about a week. It was one of the most severe national blackouts recorded up to that point.
A wave of laws against online falsehoods spread across countries including Singapore, which passed its POFMA law in 2019. Rights groups warned that many were used to restrict criticism and journalism.
During the pandemic, platforms removed or labeled claims that conflicted with public health guidance. The scale of the effort raised questions about who decides what counts as misinformation.
Facebook created an independent Oversight Board to review contested moderation decisions, including the Trump ban. Supporters called it a step toward accountability, while critics questioned its power and reach.
In October 2020, Twitter and Facebook limited the spread of a New York Post story about Hunter Biden's laptop, citing hacked-materials and misinformation concerns. Twitter later said blocking the article was a mistake.
After the January 6 Capitol riot, Twitter permanently suspended President Trump and Facebook banned him indefinitely. Removing a sitting head of state sharpened the debate over who controls online speech.
Days after the Capitol riot, Apple and Google pulled the social app Parler from their stores and Amazon cut its hosting. The app went offline, showing how infrastructure providers can also remove a platform.
Uganda shut down the internet around its January 2021 presidential election, days after blocking social media. The country had earlier imposed a tax on social media use.
Following the February 2021 coup, Myanmar's military imposed repeated internet shutdowns and social media blocks. The measures aimed to stop coverage and coordination of protests.
Australia passed a law in 2021 requiring platforms to pay news publishers for content. Facebook briefly blocked news for Australian users during the standoff before reaching agreements.
Facebook had removed posts suggesting COVID-19 might have leaked from a lab, then reversed the policy in 2021 as the idea gained mainstream attention. The shift became a case study in moderating contested science.
also in The new powers abroad: US bases, immunity, and Israeli arms
A journalist consortium reported in 2021 that NSO Group's Pegasus spyware had been used to target phones of journalists, activists, and officials. The findings showed how governments could silently monitor critics.
After the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russia blocked Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter and passed a law criminalizing so-called fake news about the military. The measures sharply tightened control over online information.
Elon Musk acquired Twitter in October 2022 and rolled back several moderation policies while reinstating banned accounts. Framing himself as a free-speech absolutist, he reshaped one of the largest speech platforms.
The Digital Services Act entered into force in 2022 and set rules for how large platforms handle illegal content, transparency, and risk. Supporters called it landmark oversight, while critics warned it could pressure lawful speech.
After Elon Musk bought Twitter, journalists were given internal records that became the Twitter Files. They documented moderation decisions and contacts between the company and government agencies, a record that supporters and critics read very differently.
The Online Safety Act became law in 2023, requiring platforms to limit illegal and harmful content and giving the regulator broad enforcement powers. Free-expression and encryption advocates warned it could chill lawful speech and weaken privacy.
Some writers and lawmakers argued that governments, platforms, and outside groups formed a censorship-industrial complex that pressured platforms to suppress lawful speech. The framing is contested, with critics saying it overstates coordination and recasts ordinary moderation as a plot.